So, as I pointed out before, last week was the annual APS March Meeting. For those of you unfamiliar with the conference, it consists of thousands of presentations given by professors, post-doctoral students, graduate students, and even undergraduate students. Most presentations are scheduled to last ten minutes followed by two minutes of questions for the speaker. This schedule is enforced by the chair of the session. This person is tasked with deciding how many questions should be asked and informing the speaker if they are running out of time. I noticed as the week went on that the talks always seemed to be rushed toward the end and there were often very few questions allowed by the session chair. This observation brought out the scientist side of me. I decided to take data and determine how long the talks were actually taking. So, this is what I did: starting on Thursday, I timed each presentation I went to and recorded the time at the end of the presentation and then again at the end of the question period. To see the results of the experiment read on! Continue Reading
I have a bit of in interest in politics and something that a few pundits and comedians have pointed out is that the current GOP field of candidates has a ton of children. So, I was curious to try to find out how probable it is that a group of people had so many children.
The relevant statistic I am interested in therefore is the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of the United States. Currently, that number is sitting at 2.1. This is the average number of children that a woman in the United States would have during her lifetime. Another piece of information I need is the distribution of family size in the United States. I couldn’t really find this information, but I did find a paper saying that family size can be modeled with the geometric distribution. This then, is all the information needed to proceed with our calculations.
The geometric distribution is completely defined by one parameter, p. And the way we can solve for p is by using the value of the TFR. The mean of the geometric distribution is given by
So, we just set μ=2.1 and solve for p. This gives a value for p of 0.323. So, that means that the probability density function looks like this:
So, now that we have characterized our distribution, we need to look at the candidates. The candidates and the number of (biological) children each has is given in the below table.
|Candidate||Number of Children|
So, with 10 candidates there is a total of 37 children. That is an average of 3.7 children per candidate. So, judging by the graph of our probability distribution above and calculating it out explicitly, there is just a 7.6% chance of that happening with a random selection of 10 people in the United States.
Does that mean that the GOP reproduces more than Democrats? Or is it a statement about presidential candidates in general? I don’t really know the answer to that and I don’t really want to invest the time to figure it out. At least in this case, religion seems to play a role with Mormon and Catholic candidates (two religions known for large families).
NOTE: I know that this is not a very good statistical analysis, but it is a first swing just to satisfy my curiosity, that is all.